Cobbett's American Gardener

[From the Herald of Freedom of July 15, 1842; Miscellaneous Writings 227-229]

 

A lovely manifesto for plain English prose and good American gardens.

 

 

This book, which is one among a thousand, and one of the few worth buying, or having, or that are not worse than nothing., among the inundation of books with which the press is flooding the world, I ought to have noticed before. Luther Hamilton of this place, bookseller, has recently published a stereotypes edition of it. He sent me in a copy, for which I sincerely thank him - as well as in behalf of the community for giving them an edition of this rare and valuable work.

    John Randolph said William Cobbett was the first genius living. He told the truth, though he was a slaveholder - and his testimony is the more valuable because he hated Cobbett. He hated him because he was a friend of humanity and human liberty, and Randolph himself an aristocrat and a tyrant. Cobbett had a bad reputation, for the reason, I have no doubt, that he deserved a good one. The clergy hated him, for his independence, and his defiance of aristocracy, of whom the clergy are always the hangers on and sycophants, where they have not the power of controlling them. When they can rule them, they do - as they do every body in their power; and when they cannot domineer over them, by force of their jugglery, they fawn on them, and help them trample down the people. Cobbett was a formidable antagonist to the tyrant classes, and hence they hated him, and have given him a bad name, which is an honor to any man in a priest-ridden world.

     This work on gardening is a modest, unpretending book, like all sterling productions. It is written in a style as beautiful as the subject, and as natural as a garden ought to be. It is worth buying for the style of it, aside from the information it contains. Every body can understand it at a glance, without a dictionary. And the book that can't be, ought never to be read. These books that abound in dictionary words, are learned nonsense and imposition. Cobbett's Gardener is full of short, every day words, which the people can understand, as readily as they can tell an onion stalk, or a cabbage plant. It is like Pierpont's poetry in that - abounding in monosyllabled words. You will find whole lines of them uninterrupted, every one as full of meaning, as it can hold - the beautiful, strong, old Saxon - the talk-words - words for use, and not for show. Every young man and woman, who has been injured in their talk and writing by going to school, ought to buy Cobbett's Gardener, or some other of his works. A young collegian should read it twice a day, till he gets well of his pedantry. Cobbett will cure him if any body can.

     "Do you teach your sons Latin, Mr. Cobbett?" asked a gentleman. "No," said the common-sense sage - "but I learn them to shave with cold water!" A bit of learning worth more to a man with a beard, than all the Latin the Monkery ever preserved from the ruins of Rome.

   You can understand the "Gardener" with once reading, just as readily as you could talk of a sensible gardener himself - and those who have followed it, say it turns out to be true - contrary to the fact of most agricultural books, which are mere speculations and theorizing, which no body can afford to practise. The subject of this book is a beautiful one to read of and talk of, if you have not any ground to work it out  on. Gardening - nothing is more interesting or profiting. We associate Paradise always with the idea of it. The great Lord Bacon (by the way not half the man that Cobbett was) said "Gardening was the purest of human pleasures." One of his famous "Essays" was "Of Gardening," if I remember the title.  But he wrote of a garden for kings and princes, - Cobbett's gardens are for men - for families - and that speaks of the difference between the two authors . Bacon was a worshipper and slave of kings, - Cobbett a friend of man. The learned world call the one "The great Sir Francis Bacon," and the other Cobbett or Bill Cobbett.

    A glorious garden, whether small or large, is a sort of Eden, and it is a fine idea, whether it was a literal fact, or an allegory merely, to show God's kindness to the man and woman He had made, that He put them, at their beginning, into a garden, "to dress it and to keep it." We fancy Eden was every thing a garden could be; but I dare say it would not have hurt Adam and Eve to have put into their hands a copy of Cobbett, written in the primeval language of humanity, which, whatever it was, they spoke, no doubt, in the same style Cobbett writes. They had not been to College - Adam to a University, nor Eve to a Boarding School.

    I cannot help saying here, what a pity it is that our cities and large towns are crowded together, so that they cannot have gardens. What a glorious sight a city would be, interspersed with them, - and how refreshing and healthful to live in it, compared with them now, crowded with stones and bricks, like an old, overstocked grave yard. A good, large garden, where every family could raise all their vegetables, and have them fresh and sweet, and have the exercise of carrying the garden on, as well as the recreation and health and enjoyment of straying among its alleys. What a luxury and a blessing! A garden and a lawn, - a city could enjoy them both as well as the country, but for a miserable avarice, which holds the land so high nobody can buy it, except for the site of their hateful piles of building. Thus selfishness always cheats itself.

    Newburyport has a good many gardens; but if the twon should flourish as they call it - commerce would pile up a great brick store in every one of them, as Boston has. And our little city of Concord [NH] is trying to crowd out all the gardens, and fill up with edifices - because a garden is not profitable! They can afford a meeting-house in almost every street; but a garden, with its refreshing opening, and its indescribable beauty, can't be afforded! One good garden of a quarter of an acre, or a quarter of that, is in my opinion worth more to a village than a dozen meeting-houses! It furnishes some food, as well as gratification, - the meeting-house nothing but spiritual starvation - and it don't cost so much to maintain the gardener neither.

    Buy "Cobbett's American Gardener," every body that has got the money.

 

N.P. Rogers




   

nathaniel rogers home