Rhode Island
Meeting
[From the Herald of
Freedom of Dec. 3, 1841; Miscellaneous Writings, 197-205]
Includes a
memorable portrait of Frederick Douglass, and powerful statements of Rogers's
radically egalitarian and anti-political opinions.
We resume our account
of the general anniversary of the State Society at Providence. Rhode Island, we
should think, from our glance of observation, aside from any information we had
obtained otherwise, rather a peculiar people. They are, we should say, a freer
- more untrammeled, less regulated
folk, than the other New Englanders we have known. They are more like David's
men in the cave of Adullam, as to hetergeneousness of character. They have not
formally bowed down their individuality before the Dagons of party and sect, as
the masses have in other States. There is therefore more hope of them. Nothing
is so hopeless as orderly subjection to sect. There is sectarianism in the little State - especially
in Providence. That Baptist College on the hill, and that steeple that runs up
two hundred feet into the sky, at the hill's foot, the pride of Rhode Island's
"sacred architecture," are not the only images sectarian idolatry has
set up there. The Rev. Dr. Tucker, of the orthodox Congregational order, has got his mosque bedecked with a platoon
of pillars in imitation of some heathen temple abroad - and topped out, in
smart imitation of the Boston State House, with a real commonwealth dome. The
honorable Episcopalians have got an old theatre fitted up into a church. It is
a terrible sombre-looking pile. It looks like tragedy, without any comic
after-piece to relieve it. Universalism has got a pile as tall as any of them,
where they go to persuade themselves out of their superstitions, which
nevertheless doubtless continue to haunt them all the while. Their pile looks
as sacred and solemn as any of the pagodas. The Unitarians have got an Athenian
temple - one of the most beautiful-looking things ever reared to Minerva or
Apollo in old Greece. Methodism has got a "where to lay its head"
also, though we forget, this moment, whereabouts it thrusts up its steeple -
pretty impudently, no doubt, for Methodism does not fear the face of clay, and is determinednot to be behind the
grandest; and there they all stand, ensnaring what worshippers they severally may. But in no one of them is
a single unqualified
principle of christianity ever preached, unless by accident. It would not be tolerated in any of them,
unless they differ from all others of their clan. They are consecrated to
religious partyism, christianity new organized, and adulterated, and ruined. Were Christ on earth, and to go into any one
of them, as He did into the synagogues of old, they would take Him by His
seamless coat colar (unless more unceremoniously) and drag him out, as Reverend
brother Bouton's Swiss guards dragged Christ's disciple, Stephen S. Foster, out of Old North steeple-house in Concord, a
few Sundays ago.[i]
While we are upon the
architectural department of Providence, we will just tell our readers of a
building or two more. The Arcade, an establishment for traders' and milliners'
shops, is one of the nicest structures in the town. It extends from street to
street, about two hundred feet in length - lighted overhead, from the sky. A
wide, broad aisle through the centre, from end to end, with a row of shops for
traders on each side in the lower story, - where vanity may shop it, and gentility lounge or promenade, in all
weathers; the upper story retreats, and contains rows of milliners' shops, with
a gallery-walk in front, - very pretty, and, we should think, convenient and
useful. Splendid rows of granite pillars sustain the gables of the roof at each
end, forming two very handsome and imposing fronts. Real granite - not sham,
like Doctor Wayland's stone
University.[ii]
We went, by the way, close up
to that Baptist school of the prophets. At a distance, we were struck with its
commanding, heavy, solid appearance. But we had had some experience of the
character of certain institutions, and so went a little nigher. It still looked
ponderous, and very like honest granite. But on perservering inspection, we
discerned the dogs' hair and the lime, and it turned out out to be genuine
imitation - wood, daubed with untempered mortar, real counterfeit, - and
behold, up on the sides of the stone edifice, the mask had peeled off, and disclosed the lathing.
Pretty illustrative, thought we, of this whole concern. A specious outside -
but hollow and sham within. An ostentatious show of learning, with shallowness
and pretension to back it up. Right off in front of its airy common - (it has a
real common, one that will
remain when the trumpery Institutes are all swept off into the Providence
river, at the foot of the hill,) stands the mansion of its Reverend and limited principal, Doctor Francis Wayland, who has
set narrower "limits to human responsibilities," a good deal, that he
has to his princele abode. We met a poor colored man on the Green, and asked
him where Dr. Wayland lived. He disfigured his face, and set down his two
baskets, and very reverently pointed it out, and said, as solemn as could be,
"There's Doctor Wayland's." The poor fellow said it, as it were,
within an inch of his life. It was a solemn sight - a real palace for a rabbi
nabob. It was in that house, probably, - in his holy study - with his gown and
green spectactles on, that the profound Doctor wrote that spider's web essay,
to prove that the people of this country were under no obligation whatever to
abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. The way he did it was by curtailing
man's
"responsibilities" to do his duty. And just so soon as the Doctor got
these responsibilities curtailed - docked, "limited"-like, - why,
then he proved, as clear as a mud-hole riled by a sow, that tyhe people had no more to do
with abolishing their slave-holding than the man in the moon. He demonstrated,
with real, shbam, university logic, that they were under no
obligation about it, and that the abolitionists were a pack of mad-caps.
There is a great
Quaker college up back in the fields, where the broad-brimmed lads are
scientifically instructed into the learned mysteries of Goeorge Fox and the New testament. A
Quaker now-a-days, we suppose, must be learned, or he will be behind the age.
The honor of the denomination must be kept up, and nothing will maintain it but
liberal learning. That is the stay and staff of all denominations. The Free
Will Baptists and Methodists are thus providing for the respectability of their
respective brotherhoods. They must have skill to read thye Testament in the original
tongues, to be able to be "wise unto salvation!" If the "Cape
Cod Come-outers," as they are called, get numerous, and degenerate into a
popular, respectable sect, they will be building theological seminaries on some
of the sand hills along the Cape. Learning is "the one thing needful" in religion.
Close by the Quaker
college is a Refuge for orphans, or for poor children of some class, built by
some horse-leech or other who sucked up the life-blood of their poor dads, and held it in his maw while he lived while
he lived, and then - having no further occasion for it, and unable to carry it
away with him, but obliged to leave it behind, in Rhode Island, vested it in an
atoning Asylum for the children he had helped beggar. We would not disturb the
ashes of this poor founder, if he were such a leech - but we would warn all
absorbers of the means of human living, not to think of circumventing God, by
heaping around them, as long as they live, the means of comfort for a thousand,
who must be poor and destitute by the means, - and then, when they can live no
longer, pile up some great, ostentatious show of charity for its dispersion, as
from his own benevolent fountain. The better way is to let the people have
their own as they go along. Their children won't be likely to need an Asylum
then.
The Atheneum is a most
tasteful, beautiful building, of real stone - planted finely in the side of the hill - overlooking the
town. We saw within it Denon's famous work on Egypt, in twenty-five enormous
folios - kept in a depot resembling an Egyptian temple covered with
Hieroglyphics. It stood in the centre of the grand library and reading room. In
another department hung a wonderful picture in Mosaic - of the ruins of
Paestum. Temples, Country, Animals and Travelers visiting - all of minute,
precious stones, planted end ways
in the surface - ground smooth, and polished, with natural colors, surpassing
in animation any thing we had ever seen of painting. The picture, some six feet
long and two wide, was said to weigh five hundred pounds, and to cost some six
thousand dollars, and to contain five millions of stones. It was a picture to
the life.
One more edifice, and we
hurry to the anti-slavery meeting. It was a "log cabin."
Aboriginality - or rather old-settlerism - has had occasion to set up a wigwam
in the thick of this populous town. Its patriotic, dignified uses having passed
away, and its hard-cider cask converted into a cold-water keg, it is in
possession of the reformed drunkards of Providence. Let the same fate speedily
befall all other hard-cider cabins in the land. We heard a noble, ranting
fellow - one of the lecturers - telling how a Reverend Divine had shut his
mouth, off in some of the back towns, because he talked too unsolemnly somehow,
for the holy building he was in. May those holy buildings all soon share the uses to which this kindred cabin is now devoted.
We hurry to Franklin Hall.
There was Abby Kelley, and Parker Pillsbury, and Frederick Douglass, (the
fugitive Othello,) and John A. Collins, and John B. Chandler, and John
Pierpont, (a spectator,) and Thomas Davis, and George L. Clarke, and William
Aplin, and William Lloyd Garrison, and William adams, and Joseph Sisson, and we
don't know how many more. We wish we had not begun to mention them, for we must
leave out "five hundred as good as they," as King Harry said of Percy
at Chevy Chase.
The meeting looked a good deal
free. The President looked like any thing but a gag-master general; and more
like a little child, than a tyrant.
The subject of Rhode
Island's new constitution draft came up. It seems the little Commonwealth has
gone on, ever since the Revolution, without a constitution. She wants one like
"the nations round about." Her power of suffrage is in the hands, under
her old royal charter, of the landholders. The Constitution proposes to put it
in the hands of all the people, with a small personal property qualification,
we don't know how much, - small enough to extend the right, it was said, to
some fourteen thousand voters. To make it go down with the people, the pitiful
creatures inserted a color
qualification. They must put in "white" - the color of the gulls you see winging their uncouth flight up and
down the harbor, - to shut out three or four hundred colored people, who
otherwise might, - when they get money enough, go to the free and equal polls, to choose their masters. The patron of
the new Constitution had assumed the name of the "Free Suffrage party." Their freedom showed itself in making a man's hue the test of his rights. They felt free to enslave a man if he was not white as a diaper. One or two of their demagogues came into the
meeting. One was a Dr. Brown, a steam doctor, whose political morality seemed
about as high as that of a railroad engine with a Jim Crow car to it; or a
church with a "nigger pew." A vote was early passed declaring the
meeting open to all speakers and voters. The Doctor gave us an expose of his white ethics. It seemed he wanted to get suffrage
for the white folks, in order, by and by to extend it to the black. It reminded us of the fable of the fox and
goat in the well. they had fallen into one - that was dry, but too deep to jump
out of. Renard being a little selfish, and a trifle sly, proposed to the goat a
mode of getting both out. You rear up on your hind legs, says he, and plant
your horns firmly against the stoning of the well, and I will leap up on to
your head and horns, and spring from thence on to the brink of the well, and
being out myself, will contrive then to get you out also, - whereas here, you
know, I can do nothing at all to help you. The goat thought it stood to
reason, and having great
confidence in Esquire Fox's honesty, complied with his proposal, and made her
head his stepping stone. The fox leaped out and escaped; but losing all
solicitude for his late companion in affliction, uttered some proverb to the
goat about trusting Foxes - shook his brush at her from the well's brink, and
scamperd off, leaving her to her meditations. We think the "Free Suffrage"
party want to make a stepping stone - a goat's head and horns - of the colored people and abolitionists;
and after they get enfranchised, they would shake a fox's tail in their faces.
But the illustration
is wanting in one particular. This lack of suffrage is not like being down in
the well; and getting it, would not have any tendency to help the colored
people out. It would prove a worthless boon in their hands. The white folks
would not acknowledge them as equals if they were nominally voters. They never
would consent to their being candidates for any thing - they would treat them
as "niggers" still.
The colored people and
their friends should never consent to such a constitution, but scout it with
utter contempt. Our counsel to them would be to pay it little attention, except
as an occasion to push the livelier the grand warfare against the pro-slavery
bulwark of this country. The abolition of slavery by the power of free
principles, is the only consummation that can avail to yield the colored man a
single right or privilege.
The "free
suffrage" Doctor fell into the merciless hands of Garrison, who tore him
limb from limb. We never saw so tremendous a triumph of morals over political
profligacy. We again lament the lack of reporters in our meetings. Some of the
richest flowers of human speech, the rarest buds of eloquence, and the noblest
sentiments are lost to the world in our anti-slavery meetings. The world is not
there to hear them, and abolitionists can't remember them. They are too common
for them to remember. They multiply in every meeting. They abound in almost
every anti-slavery speech - for it comes from the depths of the heart, and when
the heart speaks, it is eloquent. It is the head that fails when it attempts
them. Hearts talk at the anti-slavery meetings.
Friday evening was
chiefly occupied by colored speakers. The fugitive Douglass was up when we
entered. This is an extraordinary man. He was cut out for a hero. In a rising
for Libert, he would have been a Toussaint or a Hamilton. He has the
"heart to conceive, the head to contrive, and the hand to execute." A
commanding person - over six feet, we should say, in height, and of most manly
proportions. His head would strike a phrenologist amid a sea of them in Exeter
Hall, and his voice would ring like a trumpet in the field. Let the South
congratulate herself that he is a fugitive. It would not have been safe for her if he had remained about
the plantations a year or two longer. Douglass is his fugitive name. He did not wear it in slavery. Why
don't know why he assumed it, or who bestowed it on him - but there seems a fitness in it, to his commanding figure and heroic
port. As a speaker he has few equals. It is not declamation - but oratory,
power of debate. He watches the tide of discussion with the eye of the veteran,
and dashes into it at once with all the tact of the forum or the bar. He has
wit, argument, sarcasm, pathos - all that first-rate men show in their master
efforts. His voice is highly melodious and rich, and his enunciation quite
elegant, and yet he has been but two or three years out of the house of
bondage. We noticed that he had strikingly improved, since we heard him at
Dover in September. We say thus much of him, for he is esteemed by our
multitude as of an inferior race. We should like to see him before any New
England legislature or bar, and let him feel the freedom of the anti-slavery
meeting, and see what would become of his inferiority. Yet he is a thing, in American estimate. He is the chattel of
some pale-faced tyrant. How his owner would cower and shiver to hear him
thunder in an anti-slavery hall! How he would shrink away, with his infernal
whip, from his flaming eye when kindled with anti-slavery emotion. And the
brotherhood of thieves, the posse comitatus of divines, we wish a hecatomb or two of the
proudest and flintiest of them, were obliged to hear him thunder for human
liberty, and lay the enslavement of his people at their doors. They would
tremble like Belshazzar. Poor Wayland! we wish he could have been pegged to a seat in the Franklin Hall, the eveing
the colored friends spoke. His "limitations" would have abandoned him
like the "baseless fabric of a vision."
Sanderson of New Bedford,
Cole of Boston, and Stanley of Noth Carolina, followed Douglass. They all
displayed excellent ability. Sanderson and Stanley's peaking [was] of a high
order. Stanley was a young man, apparently about two and twenty - exceedingly
black - an elegant figure, rather daintily dressed. He will dress less, as he
frequents free meetings, and experiences the treatment of a man. He announced
his name, when called for by the chair, and his place - "not Stanley of
Congress," he added, with unaffected disdain and dignity - which drew him
a storm of welcome from the meeting. We had had a "Douglass," from
the names at Flodden Field, and now we have a "stanley;" and as he
was mounting the platform, we could hardly refrain from greeting him with an
"On, Stanley, on!"
"he was not the
Congress Stanley," he repeated, "nor would he stoop to rank himself
with the Wises or the Bynums of the South;" and if he did not surpass the
Virginia debater in "excellency of speech or man's wisdom," he was
truer far to humanity and liberty, and he acquitted himself in a speech of some
thirty or forty minutes to very great acceptance, and closed with periods that,
in a young debutant at
Washington, would have won the gratulations of the old hackneyed authorities in
politics and debate.
Those were the inferior race. These the young black men, who, ten years
ago, would have ben denied enrance into such an assembly of whites, except as
waiters or fiddlers. their attempts at speaking would have been met with jeers
of astonishment. It would have amazed the superior race as the ass's speech did
Balaam. Now they mingle with applause in the debates with Garrison and Foster
and Phillips. Southern slavery - "hold thine own!" - when the kindred
of your victims are this kindling northern enthusiasm on the platform of
liberty and free debate!
We are summoned away to a
discussion meeting at Chichester, appointed by Reverend Rufus A. Putnam,
new-organized Congregational clergyman of that place - and must break off here,
and accompany Parker Pillsbury on a night jaunt thither, with prospect of a
return under the midnight moon. But we go for humanity - so "cheerily O,
cheerily O." Anti-slavery will keep us warm and wide awake amid the
"nipping and eager" breath of winter and "witching time
o'night."
[i] Abby Kelley Foster (1811-1887), born into
an ordinary Massachusetts Quaker family, became a leading nineteenth-century
abolitionist and women's rights activist. Abby dedicated her life to social
justice working relentlessly to end both race and gender prejudice. At a time
when society demanded that women be silent, submissive and obedient, Abby was
none of these.
Despite
constant harassment and intense ridicule Abby never compromised her principles
and her belief that all people are created equal and deserve to be free. She
spent more than twenty years traveling across the nation as a lecturer for the
American Anti-Slavery Society becoming its pre-eminent public speaker and most
successful fundraiser. This also put her at the forefront of the women's rights
movement.
Abby and
fellow radical abolitionist Stephen Foster married in 1845 and bought a farm in
Worcester, Massachusetts. Now called Liberty Farm, it is a designated
Historical Landmark. Abby gave birth to their daughter, Alla, in 1847.
Throughout her life Abby struggled to balance her work as an anti-slavery lecturer
with her role as a loving wife and a mother. Over fifty years of her life were
dedicated to aid the cause of humanity and justice.
http://www.wwhp.org/Activities/AbbyPlay/who.html
[ii] [Wikipedia, 4.22.2008] Francis Wayland
(March 7, 1796 September 30, 1865), American Baptist educator, was born in
New York City. In Washington, D.C., Wayland Seminary was established in 1867
and was named in his honor. (In 1899, Wayland Seminary merged with another
school to become the current Virginia Union University at Richmond, Virginia.)
N. P. Rogers